ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the influences of various field-defining method of Varian accelerator on radiation dosimetry parameters, and provide theoretical basis for the beam modeling of the treatment planning system ( TPS ) . Methods The percentage depth dose ( PDD ) , the off-axis ratio ( OAR ) and the total scattering factors ( Scp ) of radiation fields were measured in three different conditions, including collimators (JAW), multileaf collimator(MLC) and JAW +MLC. The measured data was analyzed and compared with each other. Results The PDD of central axis was marginally influenced by three field-defining method. In both directions, the MLC-defined field sizes were larger by a maximum of 2. 9 mm ( left-right) or 1. 7 mm ( gun-target) than the JAW-defined ones. In the left-right direction, the width of field penumbra shaped by MLC was larger than the field of the same size as defined by JAW. The result of gun-target direction was to the contrary. In both directions, the field penumbra and size displayed no significant differences as defined by JAW+MLC or JAW. Conclusions The field size, penumbra width, and the total scattering factors were influenced by field-defining method, which indicates that special attention should be paid to the dosimetric parameters of MLC during TPS beam modeling for IMRT planning.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the influences of various field-defining method of Varian accelerator on radiation dosimetry parameters, and provide theoretical basis for the beam modeling of the treatment planning system ( TPS ) . Methods The percentage depth dose ( PDD ) , the off-axis ratio ( OAR ) and the total scattering factors ( Scp ) of radiation fields were measured in three different conditions, including collimators (JAW), multileaf collimator(MLC) and JAW +MLC. The measured data was analyzed and compared with each other. Results The PDD of central axis was marginally influenced by three field-defining method. In both directions, the MLC-defined field sizes were larger by a maximum of 2. 9 mm ( left-right) or 1. 7 mm ( gun-target) than the JAW-defined ones. In the left-right direction, the width of field penumbra shaped by MLC was larger than the field of the same size as defined by JAW. The result of gun-target direction was to the contrary. In both directions, the field penumbra and size displayed no significant differences as defined by JAW+MLC or JAW. Conclusions The field size, penumbra width, and the total scattering factors were influenced by field-defining method, which indicates that special attention should be paid to the dosimetric parameters of MLC during TPS beam modeling for IMRT planning.